.
Classification |
.......Arctodium
mahdii Hawkins, 2006
|
Specimen image
not available
at this time |
|
|
|
|
Distribution of Arctodium mahdii. |
|
|
Dorsal
view of antenna showing length of club. a) Lichnia
limbata male;
b) L.
limbata female; c) Arctodium mahdii male. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Description.Arctodium mahdii is easily distinguished
from all other species of Arctodium because of its smaller
size; it is the only species that is less than 6.5 mm long. It is also
the only species of Arctodium in which the spine on the metatibial
apex is shorter than the adjacent spurs. In all other species of Arctodium,
the spine on the metatibial apex is longer than the adjacent spur.
The male antennal club is longer in proportion to its body size than
all other species of Arctodium, but it is not as long as the
antennal club of males of Lichnia limbata. Elytral
and setal color are variable in A. mahdii, however the elytra
of males are most often reddish-black to black, and setae on all parts
of the body are usually dark brown, black, or gray. The elytra of females
are more often brownish orange, and the setae on all parts of the body
are most often golden yellow with some black setae on the apex of the
head, mouthparts, and eye canthus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remarks. Arctodium mahdii has
characters that show affinities with species of both Lichnia and Arctodium.
Because of its small size, A. mahdii may superficially resemble
species of Lichnia if generic characters are not checked with
a microscope. Arctodium
mahdii can be easily distinguished from either species of Lichnia by
examining the apex of the mandibles which are rounded and without teeth
in Lichnia versus bidentate in A. mahdii.The male antennal
club of A. mahdii is sexually dimorphic as in L. limbata,
and the female protibia are expanded while the male protibia are slender
as in both species of Lichnia. Also, the spine on the tibial
apex of males of A. mahdii is smaller than in males of other
species of Arctodium, but it is more strongly modified into
a spine than in males of Lichnia. Arctodium mahdii may
have an evolutionary relationship intermediate to the two genera. Because
in A. mahdii the galea is only slightly elongate and the apex
of the mandibles are bidentate, and because the genitalia are remarkably
similar to all other species of Arctodium and different from Lichnia,
this species was placed in the genus Arctodium by Hawkins (2006).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution. Central Chile Region
VII (Maule) to Region IX (La Araucania). A great number of specimens
in collections originate from Fundo Malcho, which used to be forested
at the time when the specimens were collected. However, this area is
now almost entirely deforested and has been developed into pine plantations
(Paulsen 2005).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Phenology. October to February.
|
|
Biological Data. For unknown reasons,
females are rarely collected.
|
|
References:
Hawkins, S. J. 2006. Revision of the Chilean tribe Lichniini Burmeister, 1844
(Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Melolonthinae). Zootaxa 1266: 1-63.
Paulsen, M. J. 2005. A revision of the southern South American stag
beetles of the genus Sclerostomus Burmeister (Coleoptera: Scarabaeoidea:
Lucanidae). Zootaxa, 1060, 1–26.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Author: Shauna
Joy Hawkins
Generated on: 26/APR/2007.....
Last modified: 26/APR/2007
University of Nebraska State Museum - Division of Entomology
|
|