|
|
Classification |
........Cyclocephala Dejean,
1821 |
|
........Cyclocephala Dejean
1821: 51.
........Mononidia Casey
1915: 110 (synonym).
........Diapatalia Casey
1915: 111 (synonym).
........Stigmalia Casey
1915: 111 (synonym).
........Spilosota Casey
1915: 112 (synonym).
........Ochrosidia Casey
1915: 112 (synonym).
........Dichromina Casey
1915: 112 (synonym).
........Homochromina Casey
1915: 113 (synonym).
........Plagiosalia Casey
1915: 135 (synonym).
........Isocoryna Casey
1915: 136 (synonym).
........Graphalia Casey
1915: 159 (synonym).
........Aclinidia Casey
1915: 113 (synonym).
........Halotosia Casey
1915: 113 (synonym).
........Aspidotites Höhne
1922b: 374 (synonym).
........Aspidolella Prell
1936: 146 (synonym).
........Albridarollia Bolivar
y Pieltaín, Jiménez-Asúa, and Martínez
1963: 182 (synonym).
........Paraclimidia Martínez
1965: 13.(synonym,
described as subgenus). |
Cyclocephalini
key |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cyclocephala carbonaria |
Cyclocephala lunulata |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution: from
extreme southeastern Canada south to Argentina and in the West Indies. Most
of the species occur in the Neotropical realm.
|
|
|
Composition: Cyclocephala is
a large genus that currently contains about 335 species, although
new species are being described continuously. Endrödi
(1985a) provided the most recent synopsis of the genus, although
90 species have been described since his work. Consequently,
the keys in his manual should be used with caution inasmuch as there
now exists 44% more species than are in the keys.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diagnosis: species in the genus may be recognized by
a clypeus with sides converging to a rounded, parabolic, subtruncate,
or emarginate apex; antenna with 8-10 segments and the club longer in
the males of a few species; maxilla armed with distinct teeth; and protarsus
in the males distinctly enlarged with the medial (or inner) claw much
larger than the outer claw (claws in females are simple). Separating Cyclocephala species
from Aspidolea species may occasionally be difficult, but in Aspidolea species
the sides of the clypeus are always divergent (sometimes only weakly)
from the base before becoming rounded at the apex, whereas in Cyclocephala species
the sides of the clypeus converge (even if slightly) to the apex. A
more reliable character is the presence of distinct teeth on the maxilla
in Cyclocephala species, whereas they are absent in Aspidolea species
(except for the large and distinctive A. fuliginea). Cyclocephala species
do not have the elongated mandible seen in most Ancognatha species,
and they also have a more or less complete frontoclypeal suture, which
is obsolete medially in Ancognatha species.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Biological notes: Adult Cyclocephala species are nocturnal,
and they are attracted to lights at night. Several species are known
to feed upon (and pollinate) the flowers of aroids and certain palms. Only
a few larvae have been described, and those feed on the roots of grasses.
|
|
|
|
|
Literature cited:
Endrödi, S. 1985a. The Dynastinae of the World.
Dr. W. Junk Publisher, Dordrecht. 800 pp., 46 plates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Author: Brett
Ratcliffe
Generated on: 05/FEB/2007 .....Last
modified: 05/FEB/2007
University of Nebraska State Museum - Division of Entomology
|
|